Skies were red with tints of orange,
pouring out to the darkness in just a matter of hours.
The rumble began and a storm was a brewing…
Plans were being dipped in and out of choppy water,
that were forming onto rivers and oceans which were crying,
crying from the terrifying thought…
of a thunderstorm began and octal-shaped clouds formed
and the very thought of wanting to enjoy the day had to end,
and so I hid for cover, the terrifying began, and the storm was coming…
I can just make you believe anything with my words…
Eventually that is what religion boils down to. (A person with a really good book (A group of Authors)) The bible in-itself be a collection of thoughts jumbled up in different perspectives of their God or their prophets, who were people themselves making us believe what they said; because for example, everything can be believed by anybody if they are a good true-author/artist/preacher/politician/philosopher. [[[This is deeper: Those are the people that we trust of course and that make us think and be free about our true thoughts or life]]]. This is because at the end of a good novel, or at the end of a good song, or at the end of a good sermon, or after a good speech, or after a good thought.
There you go, you just believed in some of my words. I told you so. 
Interviewers are like psychiatrists who know what type (technical, behavioural, etc) of questions to ask in order to understand their potential select-tee; and have a serious amounts of information to know after a formal method to know if “you’d be a great addition to the team!”
…..
How I wait.
Martin Luther - “Who loves not women, wine and song remains a fool his whole life long.“
So far I’m not a fool according to mister Luther because I love women, wine and song. Although I can’t help but think that he thought:
- homosexuality is wrong; if you don’t love women (yes even if you are a lesbian or a heterosexual guy) you are a fool.
- anything but wine is bad; so if you love your beer or milk you are a fool.
- if you hate song; then you were a fool (which I have to agree with him on this one)
However all these things are conjugated with an “and” and in logic for the consequent to be true all of the antecedents must be (simultaneously) true. Therefore if you don’t love women and you don’t love wine and you don’t love song, then you will be a fool. However if you just love one of those antecedents then you’re not a fool. This is because you just made the antecedent false and therefore the consequent must also be false. So you better love either women, wine or song or all of them. So in other words, in order to be a fool for the rest of your life, you have to hate women, wine and song.
(more…)